New Frontiers in Solar Physics:

Broadband Imaging Spectroscopy with the

Frequency Agile Solar Radiotelescope

 

Prepared by:

T.S. Bastian (NRAO), D.E. Gary (NJIT), S.M. White (UMd), and G. J Hurford (Berkeley)

 


May 2004

 

1 Introduction

 

The Sun is an ordinary star rendered extraordinary by its close proximity. Despite its stature as an ordinary star it confronts us with a large number of problems that demand a fundamental understanding. These problems are of an importance that extends well beyond the Sun itself, for it is often against our understanding of the Sun that we measure our understanding of stars and other astrophysical objects and processes. Outstanding problems in solar physics include the magnetic dynamo and the solar cycle, the solar atmosphere and solar wind, and transient energetic phenomena such as flares, coronal mass ejections, shocks, and particle acceleration. Related problems include those associated with the impact of the Sun on the Earth and near-Earth environment – space weather – problems that have practical consequences for life and technology on Earth and in space.  Radio observations have played an important role in increasing our understanding of all of these problems for many years. With the successful construction and commissioning of the radio telescope concept described here – the Frequency Agile Solar Radiotelescope (FASR) – radio observations will assume an even more central role. This is because FASR will produce data that will bring wholly unique and powerful observational diagnostics to bear on these problems. For this reason, it is expected that FASR will be the premier solar radio telescope for at least two decades or more.

 

Historically, exploration of radio emission from the Sun has proceeded along two, largely orthogonal lines: imaging observations and spectroscopy. Imaging observations have been performed at discrete frequencies with interferometric arrays for many years.

Spatially unresolved broadband spectroscopy has been pursued using fixed-frequency polarimeters, while high-resolution spectroscopy has exploited swept-frequency or broadband digital spectrographs. The types and frequency coverage of instruments that are currently used for solar observations are summarized in Appendix A. In order to exploit fully the diagnostic potential of radio emission from the Sun, both imaging and spectroscopy must be obtained simultaneously over a large bandwidth with an angular resolution, time resolution, and spectral resolution commensurate with the properties intrinsic to solar radio emissions. A consensus exists in the solar and space physics community that it is technically feasible, scientifically desirable, and timely to construct such an instrument: an advanced, solar-dedicated radio telescope designed to perform dynamic broadband, imaging-spectroscopy.

 

The FASR project was endorsed by the National Academy of Science National Research Council Astronomy and Astrophysics Survey Committee decadal survey in 2001. Specifically, the solar panel of the AASC recommended an integrated suite of instrumentation designed to meet the challenges in solar physics during the coming decade and beyond. These are the Advanced Technology Solar Telescope (ATST), a ground based 4 m telescope optimized for performance at optical and infrared wavelengths; the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO), a space based observatory designed to be the successor to the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory (SOHO); and the Frequency Agile Solar Radiotelescope (FASR). More recently, in late-2002, the NAS/NRC Committee on Solar and Space Physics decadal survey ranked the FASR project first among small projects (defined to be <$250M), the top-ranked medium and large projects being the Magnetospheric Multi-scale Mission and the Solar Probe, respectively.

 

This document serves as a brief introduction to the FASR project and the science that it will address. In Section 2, the basic instrument concept and specifications are summarized. Radio emission mechanisms are described in Section 3. The FASR science program is discussed in Section 4. The strawman instrument is discussed in somewhat greater detail in Section 5. Preliminary ideas concerning FASR operations and data management are discussed in Section 6.

 

2 Overview of the Instrument

 

The Sun produces radiation at radio wavelengths through a variety of mechanisms and in a wide variety of physical contexts. The emissions vary greatly in morphology, intensity, spectral properties, polarization properties, and their degree of variability. Particularly interesting is the centimeter through meter wavelength range, a range which probes the middle chromosphere up to the middle corona and offers a rich variety of radio diagnostic tools that can be used to address a broad program of solar physics. FASR is designed to exploit these diagnostic tools.

 

FASR will be unlike any radio telescope yet built. While it will be similar to existing radio arrays to the extent that it will produce high-resolution, high-fidelity images, it will be wholly unique in that it will produce such images at a large number of frequencies over a frequency range of 30 MHz to 30 GHz on time scales as short as a fraction of a second. In other words, it will be designed to perform dynamic broadband imaging spectroscopy.

 

As an imaging instrument, FASR will exploit Fourier synthesis imaging techniques. It will comprise three separate arrays of antennas. The extent and possible configuration of these arrays are discussed elsewhere.

 

The data produced by FASR will be inherently three-dimensional in nature: data cubes composed of many image planes distributed along the frequency axis. The basic observable, then, will be the (polarized) brightness temperature spectrum along every line of sight to the source. Moreover, a new data cube will be produced for each integration time. The evolution of the brightness temperature spectrum will therefore be available along every line of sight to the source. 

 

The data produced by FASR will provide unique and powerful new tools. These will be brought to bear on a wide range of problems. Perhaps the most important new observable will be direct and indirect measurements of coronal magnetic fields. Also included are new insights into the physics of flares, drivers of space weather, and the quiet Sun. Each of these is discussed in greater detail in Section 4.

 

An important goal of the FASR project is to mainstream the use of FASR data, much as the Yohkoh SXT and HXT mainstreamed the use of solar soft-X-ray (SXR) and hard-X-ray (HXR) observations, and SOHO/EIT and TRACE have mainstreamed the use of EUV data. This goal has important implications for operations and data management, which are discussed further in Section 5.

 

3 Solar Radio Emission Mechanisms

 

Before discussing the FASR science program, it is worth a brief digression to remind readers of the dominant emission mechanisms that occur on the Sun.  For most astrophysical objects, continuum emission in the centimeter to meter wavelength range is due to incoherent synchrotron and/or free-free radiation. Emission and absorption in spectral lines is also available for study, notably HI, radio recombination lines, and molecular lines (e.g., OH, H2O, SiO). The temperatures, densities, and magnetic field strengths encountered on the Sun are such that spectral lines play no role at centimeter, decimeter, and meter wavelengths. Furthermore, polarimetric techniques are limited. Strong differential Faraday rotation washes out any linearly polarized component in most cases (see Sections 4.1.2 and 4.3.1, however). Hence, most investigations are limited to studies of the Stokes I and V parameters.

 

Nevertheless, the radio spectrum at centimeter, decimeter, and meter wavelengths is rich in diagnostic potential because two of the natural frequencies of the solar atmosphere – the electron plasma frequency and the electron cyclotron frequency – are often of the same order as the observed radio frequency. Three distinct radio emission mechanisms are widespread in the solar atmosphere and are commonly available for diagnosing physical conditions in the source:

 

Plasma radiation is a coherent emission mechanism that involves the nonlinear excitation of plasma waves by a non-equilibrium electron distribution – e.g., energetic electron beams (type III radio bursts) or MHD shocks (type II radio bursts) – and their subsequent conversion to electromagnetic waves near the electron plasma frequency npe=9ne1/2 kHz and/or its harmonic 2npe; ne is the electron number density (cm-3). Plasma radiation processes typically produce radiation at decimeter and longer wavelengths.

 

Gyromagnetic radiation results from the acceleration experienced by electrons in a magnetic field due to the Lorentz force. It is convenient to refer to thermal gyroresonance emission and thermal or nonthermal gyrosynchrotron emission, the nonrelativistic and weakly-relativistic counterparts to synchrotron radiation. Thermal gyroresonance emission results from hot  (Te ~ 2 x 106 K) thermal plasma interacting with strong magnetic fields (B > 100 G). It produces radio emission at low harmonics s=1,2,3,4 of the electron cyclotron frequency nBe = 2.8B MHz, where B is in units of Gauss.  Gyrosynchrotron emission is produced by thermal or nonthermal populations of energetic electrons (10s of keV to several MeV) at harmonics s ~ 10 – 100 of WBe.

 

Bremsstrahlung radiation results from collisions between electrons and ions and is therefore ubiquitous. Thermal bremsstrahlung radiation is emitted by a thermal plasma, and provides diagnostics of temperature and density.  The slight mode-dependence of this mechanism allows it to be used in some circumstances as a diagnostic of the longitudinal component of the magnetic field as well.

 

Several other emission mechanisms may play an important role on the Sun and offer additional diagnostics. These include the cyclotron maser (Melrose & Dulk 1982), radiation from electrons accelerated in strong DC electric fields (Tajima et al. 1990), and transition radiation resulting from the interaction of electrons with small scale turbulence (Fleishman & Kahler 1992). One, two, or even more of the possible emission mechanisms may occur simultaneously on the Sun.

 

The major advance offered by the FASR is time-resolved, broadband, imaging-spectroscopy. FASR will produce high-spatial-resolution images with excellent dynamic range and fidelity, and with sufficient spectral and temporal resolution to enable observers to measure the radiation spectrum and its evolution in time at each point in the field of view. In so doing it will enable full exploitation of the many radiative diagnostics available. We now turn to the major science themes that the FASR is designed to address.

 

4 FASR Science

 

Based on extensive discussions among members of the solar physics community, most recently the FASR Science Definition Workshop, hosted by the NRAO in Green Bank, WV, in May, 2002, several key areas have been identified in which FASR is expected to make significant new contributions. These are:

 

  • The nature and evolution of coronal magnetic fields
  • Physics of flares
  • Drivers of space weather
  • The quiet Sun

           

In the remainder of this section, we discuss each of these in greater detail, recognizing that with its unique and comprehensive capabilities, FASR has tremendous potential for new discoveries and unanticipated uses of the data it produces. Interested readers should also see Gary & Keller (2004).

4.1 The Nature and Evolution of Coronal Magnetic Fields

 

A key strength of FASR is that it provides unique observables of direct relevance to a number of outstanding problems in solar physics. One such problem is coronal magnetic fields, which have heretofore been inaccessible to quantitative study. Quantitative knowledge of coronal magnetic fields is crucial to virtually all solar physics above the photosphere, including the structure and evolution of active regions, flares, filaments, and coronal mass ejections.  The measurement of vector magnetic fields in the photosphere using optical and infrared lines is a well-developed technique, and in the absence of routine measurements of coronal magnetic fields, considerable resources are devoted to extrapolating the observed surface magnetic field distribution into the upper chromosphere and corona under the assumption that it is potential or force-free (see Fig. 2).  These extrapolations are difficult, depend sensitively on measurements at the photospheric level, and rely on assumptions that need to be more thoroughly tested.

 

Radio observations provide the means of both directly and indirectly measuring magnetic fields in the corona. However, such measurements require a broadband imaging capability. The FASR provides that capability. We describe below several means of measuring or constraining the magnetic field in active regions and in quiet regions. We defer a discussion of magnetic field measurements in flares to Section 4.2.2.

4.1.1 Coronal magnetography using gyroresonance absorption

 

Active regions are those regions on the Sun where strong magnetic fields have buoyantly emerged through the photospheric surface into the corona. Their photospheric signature is manifest in sunspots, but their true nature is revealed by observations in EUV (Fig. 1), SXR, and radio emission: active regions are complex and evolving magnetic structures composed of magnetic loops containing hot plasma. As their name implies, flares and other forms of solar activity originate in active regions.

 

 

Figure 1: Example of an active region complex (AR9462/9463) observed by the Big Bear Solar Observatory in Ha (left) and by the Transition Region and Chromosphere Explorer (TRACE; right) on 24 May 2001.

 

Radio observations provide the only means to measure coronal magnetic field strengths  G above the chromosphere. Strong magnetic fields render the corona optically thick to gyroresonance absorption at centimeter wavelengths (see White & Kundu 1997 for a detailed discussion). Emission observed at a given frequency originates from a narrow resonance layer where the frequency matches a low harmonic (typically, the second or third harmonic) of the electron gyrofrequency WBe, which is linearly proportional to the magnetic field strength. As the observing frequency is varied, the resonance layer – or isogauss surface – from which the emission originates also varies (Figs. 2, 3). The observed brightness temperature corresponds to the electron temperature in the resonance layer. At the base of the corona, the electron temperature drops precipitously from coronal to chromospheric values. Radio emission from the resonant layers passing through the base of the corona manifests itself as a break in the radio spectrum. By measuring the radio frequency at which the spectral break occurs along a given line of sight, the magnetic field at the base of the corona is determined. FASR will provide a brightness temperature spectrum along each line of sight through the source, thereby enabling a map of the magnetic field at the base of the corona to be assembled.

 

FASR will, in addition, constrain the vector magnetic field and its evolution in active regions. Fig. 2 shows how gyroresonance emission at different frequencies arises on nested surfaces of constant magnetic field.  The particular isogauss level at which the corona is rendered optically thick to gyroresonance absorption depends on the magnetoionic mode of the radiation (ordinary or extraordinary) and the strength and orientation of the field. The dense spectral coverage provided by FASR provides complete sampling of the coronal volume over active regions. Dense spectral coverage translates into continuous magnetic field strength coverage.  When coupled with extrapolation techniques FASR observations provide the means of performing three-dimensional coronal magnetography where the magnetic field strength exceeds ~100 G.

 

 

 

Figure 2: A perspective view of AR6615 (7 May 1991) is shown in white light continuum with extrapolated field lines from a nonlinear force-free calculation by Z. Mikic. The three surfaces are the gyroresonant surfaces in the corona that will dominate the radio opacity at each of three radio frequencies: 5 GHz (B = 600 G), 8 GHz (B = 950 G) and 11 GHz (B = 1300 G), assuming s=3. (from J. Lee/NJIT).

 

 

 

Figure 3: VLA observations of AR6615 at 5, 8.4, and 15 GHz. The radio brightness distribution has been superposed on the white light continuum image. The radio emission originates from an isogauss surface in each case. (after Lee et al. 1998).

 

 

4.1.2 Magnetic constraints from radio propagation

 

Another unique capability provided by the FASR is the means of constraining the magnetic field topology above active regions using the mode coupling properties of the radio radiation (Ryabov 2003).  When radio radiation traverses a magnetic field wherein the longitudinal field component changes sign, the polarization of the radiation may reverse, depending on whether the coupling between the ordinary and extraordinary modes is strong or weak.  As seen in projection against the Sun by a distant observer, the line that demarcates the reversal in the sense of circular polarization (Stokes V=0) is called the “depolarization strip'” (e.g., Bandiera 1982). Using the frequency agility of the FASR, a “depolarization sheet'” can be deduced above active regions, thereby providing a three-dimensional topological constraint on the magnetic field: i.e., the locations where it is perpendicular to the line of sight.

 

High in the corona, differential Faraday rotation is greatly reduced at centimeter wavelengths. If observed with a sufficiently narrow band with high resolution (10s of kHz), the Faraday oscillations of the linearly polarized emission associated with quasitransverse propagation can be observed (Alissandrakis & Chiuderi-Drago 1994, 1995). It is not yet clear, however, whether the FASR design will allow a mode with sufficient spectral resolution for this specialized purpose.

Figure 4: (a) white light continuum image of AR6615; (b) photospheric magnetogram of AR6615 – white indicates that the longitudinal component of the magnetic field is directed toward the observer; (c) a Stokes V map of the 4.9 GHz emission; (d) the same for the 15 GHz emission. Note that the magnetic neutral line, or depolarization strip, in the 4.9 and 15 GHz V maps (dashed lines labeled C and U, respectively) are significantly displaced from the magnetic neutral line in the photosphere (labeled NL; from Ryabov 2003).

 

4.1.3 Measuring weak magnetic fields using free-free emission

 

A magnetized plasma is “birefringent” to free-free radiation because the ordinary and extraordinary modes have different absorption coefficients. For a uniform thermal plasma, the degree of circular polarization of the optically thin emission is , where q is the angle between the magnetic field vector and the line of site, so that B cosq is the longitudinal component of the magnetic field. In reality, the density and magnetic field (and to some extent, the temperature) vary along the line of site and  is represented by a density-weighted integral along the line of sight. Moreover, the emission at a given frequency is not always optically thin along a given line of sight. A more general treatment of the problem in the weak field limit (Gelfreikh 2003) shows that useful constraints on the coronal magnetic field may nevertheless be deduced from spectrally resolved observations of free-free emission. An example of an observation of a small active region by the Nobeyama Radioheliograph (NoRH) is shown in Fig. 5. FASR will have tremendous sensitivity as well as a large amount of frequency redundancy, thereby allowing it to constrain the longitudinal magnetic field in the corona to low limits (~10 G).

 

Figure 5: Thermal free-free emission from a active region, observed by the NoRH at 17 GHz. The upper left panel shows contours of total intensity superposed on a grayscale representation. The peak  brightness temperature is TB=27 x 103 K. The lower left panel shows the same contours superposed on a photospheric magnetogram. The upper-right panel shows contours of Stokes V superposed on the magnetogram degraded to the resolution of the NoRH, while the lower right shows contours of rc=V/I, the peak of which is 2.8%.

 

Measurements of the magnetic field in and above active regions and elsewhere in the corona will provide critical new insights into the temporal evolution of coronal magnetic fields, the role of currents in the corona, and the storage and release of magnetic energy. In addition to providing critical inputs to the important problem of the nature and evolution of coronal magnetic fields, coronal magnetic field measurements may have practical utility as well. We return to this point in Section 4.5.

4.2 The Physics of Flares

 

Flares involve the catastrophic release of energy in the low corona. Plasma is heated and particles are accelerated to relativistic energies on short time scales. A large flare may require the acceleration of  electrons s-1 to energies >20 keV for periods of tens of seconds (Miller et al. 1998). Flares are often accompanied by the ejection of mass by an associated filament eruption and/or a coronal mass ejection (see Section 4.3). 

 

 

Figure 6: The flare of 16 March 1993 observed in soft X-rays by the Yohkoh SXT (left) and at 17 GHz by the NoRH (right). From Hanaoka (1994).

 

A schematic view of flares is given in Fig. 7. Briefly, magnetic energy release occurs in the low corona through fast magnetic reconnection. It is believed to be a highly fragmented process, with many discrete energy release events taking place (see below). The multitudes of type III-like bursts that occur during the impulsive phase of flares may be intimately connected to energy release. Electrons with access to open magnetic field lines produce classical type III radio bursts; some extend into interplanetary space. A blast wave and/or fast ejecta produced by the flare may produce MHD shocks in the corona and an associated coronal type II radio burst. Electrons and ions are promptly accelerated to high energies by quasi-static electric fields, shocks, and/or stochastic processes (Miller et al. 1998). Based on detailed studies of hard X-ray timing (Aschwanden 1998; Aschwanden et al. 1998; Aschwanden et al. 1999), as well as joint HXR/microwave studies (e.g., Lee et al. 2002) it appears that electron transport in many flares is well-described by the “direct precipitation and trap plus precipitation” (DPTPP) model.  Energetic electrons with small pitch angles are guided by the magnetic field directly to the chromosphere, where they are stopped by relatively cool, dense material. Most of their energy goes into heating the ambient chromospheric plasma but a fraction is emitted radiatively via nonthermal bremsstrahlung as HXRs. Electrons with larger pitch angles are trapped by coronal magnetic fields and emit nonthermal gyrosynchrotron radiation. Eventually they are scattered into the loss cone via Coulomb collisions or wave-particle interactions and precipitate out of the magnetic trap, producing additional HXRs. Energy deposition in the chromosphere heats it to >107 K, causing it to expand dynamically into the corona (chromospheric evaporation), filling coronal magnetic loops at the flare site with dense, soft-X-ray-emitting plasma. In the aftermath of a flare, these hot, post-flare loops continue to emit SXRs. 

 

Figure 7: Cartoon of a flare model suggesting a global view of acceleration and ablation processes in the context of density measurements by coherent radio bursts and SXR emission.  The panel on the right illustrates a radio spectrogram (dynamic spectrum) with bursts indicated schematically. The acceleration site is located in a low-density cusp from where electron beams are accelerated in upward (m-l type III) and downward (reverse-slope bursts) directions. (from Aschwanden & Benz 1997).

 

The study of flares offers one of the best available means of studying magnetic energy storage, magnetic energy release, charged particle acceleration, wave-particle interactions, and charged particle transport in an astrophysical plasma in detail and under a variety of conditions. FASR will, for the first time, allow full exploitation of microwave through meter-l emissions for flare studies. Moreover, it will provide an integrated view of these emissions in time: the role of coherent burst emissions due to electron beams at decimeter wavelengths, of the incoherent gyrosynchrotron emission due to trapped and precipitating electrons at centimeter wavelengths, and associated phenomena (shocks, CMEs, escaping electrons) at meter wavelengths (see below). In other words, it will provide a three-dimensional view of important physical processes that occur during flares and will provide insight into the coupling between different parts of the flaring volume. We touch on a few of these possibilities here.

4.2.1 Location and properties of the energy release site

 

Work over the past decade, in large part at radio wavelengths, has demonstrated that energy release in solar flares is fundamentally a fragmentary process.  Progress has been made in recent years on identifying tracers of energy release in the solar corona (see Bastian, Benz, & Gary 1998 for a review). Decimetric type III bursts (type IIIdm) occur most commonly in the 400-800 MHz range but have been known to occur at both lower and much higher frequencies. This frequency range corresponds to densities of 2-8 x 109 cm-3, i.e., the densities where energy release in flares is thought to take place. Multitudes of bursts are released during the course of the impulsive phase of a flare (Fig. 8). Type IIIdm bursts are more numerous than metric type IIIs and show positive or negative frequency drifts, indicating upward or downward motion in the corona. Some events show positive and negative drifts, indicating the presence of bi-directional electron beams. Outward propagating electron beams sometimes show a reversal in frequency drift (type U bursts), indicating that the beam is propagating along a closed magnetic loop. Type IIIdm bursts are believed to be intimately related to energy release via magnetic reconnection.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Figure 8: An example of a dyamic spectrum showing multitudes of reverse-slope type IIIdm radio bursts during the impulsive phase of a flare. The fact that the burst frequencies drift in time from low to high frequencies indicates that the electron beam exciters are propagating downward from the corona to a denser environment. From Isliker and Benz (1994).

 

While spectroscopic observations of classical and reverse-drift type IIIs during flares have been performed for many years, they have been imaged directly at decimeter wavelengths rarely, and then only at a fixed frequency (e.g., Aschwanden et al. 1994). 

FASR will provide an unprecedented opportunity to image the energy release site in three dimensions. By imaging the trajectories of upward- and downward-directed electron beams, the location of energy release can be precisely determined. Furthermore, by measuring the trajectories of nonthermal electron beams, the local magnetic topology in the energy release site will be illuminated. Finally, the density in the energy release site will be determined directly from the frequency of emission.  These measurements will place important, new, and unique constraints on the location and physical properties of the energy release site, on the relevant magnetic topology, and on the nature of the energy release process itself.

 

4.2.2 Magnetic field in the flaring volume

 

Microwave emission in flares is due to incoherent gyrosynchrotron emission from electrons with energies of several 10s of keV to several MeV that have been injected into coronal magnetic loops.  The microwave spectrum and polarization, which depend sensitively on the electron distribution function and the local magnetic field, will be available at every location in the source. The spectral maximum typically occurs between 5-15 GHz. Hence both the optically thick and optically thin parts of the spectrum are useful for fitting the magnetic field strength and orientation in a flaring source as a function of position and time. Modeling efforts along these lines have been presented recently by Nindos et al. (2002).

 

Figure 9: Example of damped loop oscillations observed by TRACE. From Aschwanden et al. (2002)

 

Additional and independent constraints are available on the magnetic field in a flaring source. Coronal loop oscillations have long been recorded at radio wavelengths (e.g., Trottet et al. 1981). With the discovery of loop oscillations at EUV wavelengths by TRACE (Shrijver et al. 2002; Aschwanden et al. 2002) there is renewed interest in “coronal seismology”, wherein loop oscillations excited by flares can be used as a probe of local plasma conditions, including the magnetic field. Another example is the use of timing comparisons between HXR and microwave emissions which ``calibrate'' the harmonic of the emitting electrons as a function of location in the source, thereby allowing the magnetic field strength to be inferred (Bastian 1999). Radio techniques are unique in their ability to provide quantitative measurements of coronal magnetic fields in flaring sources.

 

4.2.3 Electron acceleration and transport

 

The fundamental mechanism(s) of particle acceleration in flares remain(s) largely unknown. Broadband imaging spectroscopy will image the flaring source from chromospheric to coronal heights, yielding an integrated view of energy release, electron acceleration, and electron transport. The microwave spectrum is a particularly powerful diagnostic of the details of the emitting distribution of energetic electrons including high-energy cutoffs and anisotropies (Fleishman & Melnikov 2003ab).  FASR will perform time-resolved imaging spectroscopy. The time evolution of the radiation spectrum and, hence, the electron distribution function, will be tracked at each positioning the flaring source.

 

 

 

Figure 10: An example of the time variation of the NoRH 17 GHz brightness compared to the HXR count rate as measured by BATSE/CGRO for a simple flaring magnetic loop.  The panels to the left show a 17 GHz map at the time of the flare maximum. Light curve B shows Stokes I near the loop top. Light curve A shows Stokes V at the right-circularly polarized footpoint; Light curve C shows the absolute value of Stokes V for the left-circularly polarized footpoint.  B is delayed relative to A and C and all radio emission is delayed relative to the HXR emission. From Bastian, Benz, & Gary (1998)

 

It is also worth pointing out that, due to the fact that magnetic loops behave like dispersive elements, with more energetic particles emitting in weak-field regions and less energetic particles emitting in strong-field regions (Bastian, Benz, & Gary 1998), the relative timing of temporal features at different frequencies and different locations in the source offers an additional diagnostic of acceleration and transport. In particular, joint microwave/HXR observations can be used to constrain the roles of Coulomb collisions and wave-particle interactions (e.g., whistler waves) to pitch-angle scattering and electron acceleration in flares. Although space based HXR imagers such as RHESSI provide images of the nonthermal HXR emission from ~10 keV to MeV energies, these emissions originate from precipitation points, where fast electrons impact the dense atmosphere at the foot points of flaring magnetic loops. In contrast, FASR will image emission whenever and wherever energetic electrons are present in the flaring volume with the requisite sub-second time resolution.

4.2.4 Chromospheric ablation

 

Electrons accelerated to high energies can stream along the coronal magnetic field to the chromosphere if their pitch angle is sufficiently small. There, they collide with the relatively dense, cold, plasma and produce HXR emission via nonthermal bremsstrahlung. The electrons are thermalized and heat the chromospheric plasma, which is ablated into the corona where it emits copious SXRs.  In addition to diagnosing the magnetic field and the details of the energetic electron population, spatially and spectrally resolved radio observations over a broad frequency range offer a means of probing the changing density of the ambient plasma due to chromospheric ablation and, therefore, a means of tracking energy deposition.

 

Razin suppression depends on the density of the ambient plasma and the local magnetic field strength. Since the magnetic field will be constrained by other means, the ambient density may be inferred as a function of position and time during the course of a flare. An alternate and independent means of probing chromospheric ablation is to exploit the interaction of reverse-slope type IIIdm bursts with the ablated material (Aschwanden & Benz 1995).

 

4.3 Drivers of Space Weather

 

The term “space weather” refers to a vast array of phenomena that can disturb the interplanetary medium and/or affect the Earth and near-Earth environment. This includes recurrent structures in the solar wind (fast solar wind streams, co-rotating interaction regions), the ionising radiation and hard particle radiations from flares, radio noise from the Sun, coronal mass ejections, and shock-accelerated particles. These drivers result in geomagnetic storms, changes in the ionosphere, and atmospheric heating which can, in turn, result in a large variety of effects that are of practical concern to our technological society: ground-level currents in pipelines and electrical power grids, disruption of civilian and military communication, spacecraft charging, enhanced atmospheric drag on spacecraft, etc.

 

The drivers of space weather – fast and slow solar wind streams, flares, and coronal mass ejections – are all solar in origin. An understanding of space weather phenomena lies, in part, in gaining a fundamental understanding of these drivers. At a more practical level, space weather forecasting and “nowcasting” are of interest as a means of avoiding disruptions, protecting technological assets, and safeguarding the health of humans in space. Forecasting requires the identification and timely dissemination of information relevant to space weather drivers. In this section we briefly note several ways in which FASR will contribute to both a fundamental understanding of drivers of space weather. In a separate section we discuss contributions FASR could play to forecasting/nowcasting activities.   

                                                      

4.3.1 Detection and characterization of coronal mass ejections

 

Coronal mass ejections (CMEs) involve the destabilization and ejection of a significant portion of the corona. CME masses range from ~1014-1016 g and possess speeds of ~200-2000 km s-1. The kinetic energy of a CME is therefore comparable to large solar flares.

 

Figure 11: SOHO/LASCO observation of a fast CME on 20 April 1998. A SOHO/EIT image of the Sun is shown for comparison.

 
                                                                   

 

Interest in coronal mass ejections (CMEs) has been particularly strong because they are associated with the largest geo-effective events and the largest solar energetic particle (SEP) events. With the detection of synchrotron radiation from CMEs (Bastian et al. 2001) a new tool has become available to detect, image, and diagnose the properties of CMEs. An example is shown in Fig. 12, where radio emission is shown from relativistic electrons entrained in the expanding CME loops. Fits of a simple synchrotron model to two- and three-point spectra at various locations in the source illustrate the potential for imaging spectroscopy with FASR. The low frequency cutoff is due to Razin suppression. The fits yield not only the magnetic field of the CME, but the ambient density of the thermal plasma as well. Radio CMEs may be significantly linearly polarized by the time they propagate to several solar radii from the Sun. Detection of linearly polarized radiation from radio CMEs would provide additional leverage on the magnetic field in CMEs.

 

CMEs  can be detected by other means. Using the Clark Lake Radio Observatory, Gopalswamy & Kundu (1993) report observations of thermal radiation signatures of a CME near the plasma level at 38.5, 50, and 73.8 MHz. More recently, thermal emission from CMEs (Kathiravan et al. 2002), and coronal dimmings resulting from the launch of a CME (Ramesh and Sastry 2000) have been reported in observations made by the Gauribidanur Radioheliograph between 50-65 MHz although Bastian & Gary (1997)

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure 12: Example of a radio CME, the radio counterpart to that shown in Fig. 10, imaged by the Nancay Radioheliograph at a frequency of 164 MHz. The panel to the left shows the expanding CME loops (emission from the background Sun has been subtracted). The panel to the right shows model fits to multi-point spectra and the lines of sight indicated to the left.

 

show that similar phenomena should be detectable at decimetre/meter wavelengths as well.

 

The advantages of CME detection and characterization at radio wavelengths with FASR are: i) there is no occulting disk, so earth-directed CMEs may be detected; ii) CMEs will be detected in their nascent stages of development and can be directly associated with structures such as filament channel arcades; iii) unlike SXR and white-light observations, observations at radio wavelengths are sensitive to both thermal free-free emission from CMEs and nonthermal constituents.  Owing to its frequency agility the FASR will provide a comprehensive observational picture of CMEs and associated phenomena over a wide frequency range.

 

4.3.2 Detection and characterization of “EIT waves” and dimmings

 

Coronal waves, possible analogs to chromospheric Moreton waves, were discovered by the SOHO/EIT instrument (Thompson et al. 1999, 2000; Biesecker et al 2002) although examples have since been discovered in SXR (Khan & Aurass 2002). They represent the dynamical response of the corona to a flare and/or an associated CME. An associated phenomenon is a coronal dimming, observed in SXR (e.g., Sterling & Hudson 1997) and EUV (Harra & Sterling 2001), believed to result from the removal of coronal material due to the lift-off of a CME.

 

A radio counterpart to an “EIT wave” was recently detected by the NoRH at 17 GHz (White & Thompson 2003) in association with a flare and CME on 24 Sep 1997. This, coupled with observations of coronal dimmings mentioned in Section 4.3.1, suggests that FASR will excel in detecting and characterizing the response of the solar atmosphere to flares and coronal mass ejections. Since FASR will be sensitive to emissions from chromospheric to coronal heights, it will provide a complete view of chromospheric and coronal waves, dimmings, and the interaction of waves with surrounding structures such as active regions (e.g., Ofman and Thompson 2002).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure 13: A sequence of SOHO/EIT difference images in Fe XII 195 A (1.5 MK) showing an “EIT wave” observed on 12 May 1997. The coronal wave accompanied a “halo” (Earth-directed) CME.

4.3.3 Detection and characterization of MHD shocks

 

 It is generally accepted that type II radio bursts are a tracer of fast MHD shocks. The shocks that produce coronal type II radio bursts may be driven by fast ejecta (Gopalswamy et al. 1997), by a blast wave (Uchida 1974, Cane & Reames 1988), or by a CME (Cliver et al 1999; Classen & Aurass 2002). Fast ejecta and/or a blast wave are produced by a flare; a CME produces a piston-driven shock wave. The relationship between these shocks, their radio-spectroscopic signature, and other phenomena of interest such as Moreton waves and “EIT waves” remains a matter of considerable controversy, as discussed by Cliver et al. (1999), Gopalswamy (2000),  Gopalswamy et al. (2001) and Klassen et al. (2000).

 

With its unique ability to perform imaging spectroscopy, FASR will be able to simultaneously image the basic shock driver (flare or CME), the response of the atmosphere to the driver (chromospheric and coronal waves and coronal dimmings), and shocks which may form due to the flare or the CME. The emphasis placed on FASR’s ability to provide an integrated picture of the flare phenomena applies equally to CMEs and associated phenomena (type II radio bursts, EIT and Moreton waves, filament eruptions).

4.3.4 Origin of solar energetic particle events

 

Particle acceleration in flares and shocks has been of fundamental interest for many years. Of particular relevance to space weather studies are solar energetic particle (SEP) events. During the past ~15 years, SEP events have been classified as impulsive or gradual events (e.g., Reames 1999) based on the properties of the associated soft X-ray flare, correlations with radio bursts of type III (impulsive) or types II/IV (gradual), abundances and charge states of the energetic particles, and the presence or absence of a CME. Impulsive SEP events were believed to originate in solar flares while the energetic particles in gradual SEP events were thought to be accelerated in CME-driven coronal and/or interplanetary shocks. Since the largest SEP events are gradual events in this scheme, interest in particle acceleration by CME-driven shocks has remained high.

 

Several analyses of radio spectroscopic and energetic particle data have called this simple picture into question (Klein et al. 1999; Laitenin et al. 2000; Klein & Trottet 2001), arguing that sustained particle acceleration can occur in the mid-corona. Based on an observed correlation between certain type III radio bursts and SEP events, Cane, Erickson, & Prestage (2003) have recently argued that flare particles have access to the interplanetary medium via open magnetic field lines. Detailed observations of abundances and charge states by the Advanced Composition Explore (ACE) suggest that at the very least, the impulsive/gradual paradigm requires modification in recognition of complicating realities.

 

As an instrument that images coronal energy release and particle acceleration in the middle corona, tracers of coronal shocks, and the onset and ejection of certain coronal mass ejections, simultaneously, FASR will provide key observations that will help resolve the important and controversial problem of the origin of SEPs.

 

4.4 The Solar Atmosphere

 

Our understanding of the solar atmosphere has undergone significant changes of perspective over the years. All have been driven by observational advances. With the discovery of a high temperature corona in 1930s, and later the solar wind in the 1960s, a great deal of work has been devoted to understanding the nature of the nonradiative mechanism(s) required to sustain both phenomena. Early theories of the solar atmosphere were spherically or azimuthally symmetric. One of the most important lessons of the Skylab mission in the early-1970's was that the corona is far from symmetric -- it is highly structured by the magnetic field, as well as by density and temperature gradients, on a wide variety of scales. More recently, the SXT on board the Yohkoh satellite has revealed that, in addition, the solar corona is highly dynamic. It is constantly changing on time scales of seconds to minutes, hours, days, and years. Coupled with progress at radio, UV, and optical wavelengths, it is now appreciated that the entire solar atmosphere -- from the photosphere to the corona, and out into the solar wind – is a highly structured and restless entity.

4.4.1 Coronal heating

 

One of the fundamental questions in solar physics is how the solar corona maintains its high temperature of several million Kelvin above a surface with a temperature of 6000 K.  The power needed to maintain the corona above an active region against radiation and conduction losses is >1028 erg s-1 (Shimizu 1995).  The leading theoretical ideas for how the corona is heated include either some form of resonant wave heating (e.g., Ofman, Klimchuk, & Davila 1998 ) or “nanoflares” (Parker 1988), although there exist many other models. FASR will provide observational inputs with which to test these, and other, types of model.

 

Wave heating models make specific predictions of where and on what time scales energy deposition occurs in coronal magnetic loops. FASR will provide a detailed history of the temperature, density, and magnetic field in coronal loops in active regions, from which the rate of energy deposition can be calculated as a function of position and time. The role of “nanoflares” – tiny, flare-like releases of energy from small magnetic reconnection events – depends critically on the rate at which such events occur.  Numerous studies have shown that X-ray events ranging over as much as five orders of magnitude in energy, from 1027 to 1032 erg, form a single power law with slope 1.5-1.6.  Smaller events cannot be energetically significant relative to the larger events unless the rate distribution at lower energies becomes significantly steeper. Recent observational work at EUV wavelengths suggests that it may not be (Benz & Krucker 1999; Aschwanden & Parnell 2002).

 

Text Box: Figure 14: Temporal evolution of network flares observed in SXR and radio emission on 20 Feb 1995 by the VLA and Yohkoh. The image at the top shows the region observed in SXRs; the inset shows its location on the solar disk. Enhanced emission is dark. The locations of network flares are indicated by boxes. The plots below show the temporal variations of the SXR flux in the Al.1 and AlMg filters, and the 2 cm radio emission for the different network flares. (from Krucker et al. 1997)

 

 

At radio wavelengths Gary, Hartl & Shimizu (1997) established that the 1027 erg SXR events in active regions studied by Shimizu (1995) are accompanied by nonthermal electrons; i.e., they are flare-like.  Even events that are near the limit of visibility for the Yohkoh SXT typically have radio counterparts that are easily detectable in total power by small non-imaging radio telescopes. High-quality imaging will lower the flux limit one achieves in microwaves by orders of magnitude.  Krucker et al. (1997) and Benz & Krucker (1999), using multiband VLA and SOHO EIT and MDI data, have show that even tiny transient events in the quiet chromospheric network are, in fact, flare-like.

 

FASR will greatly improve on previous work by providing vastly better frequency coverage and a sensitivity comparable to the VLA under some circumstances.  The instrument's full-Sun capability should allow FASR to obtain accurate counting statistics on the occurrence rate of these events, and to determine whether that rate increases greatly enough at low energies to heat the corona.

4.4.2 Structure and dynamics of the chromosphere

 

In weak-magnetic-field regions, thermal gyroresonance emission is negligible and the radio emission is largely due to thermal free-free emission.[1] Microwave radiation is formed under conditions of LTE and the source function is therefore Planckian. For microwave observations the Rayleigh-Jeans approximation is valid and the observed intensity is linearly proportional to the kinetic temperature of the emitting material for optically thick sources (in contrast with lines in the visible and UV). By varying the frequency, one samples the thermal state of optically thick plasma at heights ranging from the mid-chromosphere to the low-corona. The broadband imaging capability of the FASR will be exploited to probe the thermal structure of the solar atmosphere in active regions, the quiet Sun, and coronal holes, as well as in filaments and prominences.

 

The chromosphere will be a particularly interesting target for the FASR. In recent years it has become evident that the prevailing semi-empirical chromospheric models, largely based on non-LTE UV/EUV line and IR/submm/mm continuum observations and computed under the assumption of hydrostatic equilibrium, are in stark disagreement with observations in bands of carbon monoxide (CO) and with microwave observations. In particular, observations of th